I’ve been thinking a lot about these things lately, as I have been reading a lot of self published lit mags and ezines and “outsider” small press offerings. In fact, I just ordered a bunch of goodies to support some of my new favorites. But there’s a lot of confusion and disagreement about what an “outsider” is. Excluded, or rejected? Empowered or oppressed? Is an “outsider” somebody who chooses to be on the outside for “political” reasons or somebody barred from entrance by groups determined to maintain the status quo? Can groups keep artists and writers on the “outside” when anyone can transform the dynamics of the circle? How many people are inside but describe themselves otherwise? Is the idea that people can actually change the circle/power a lie? Is the answer to take the exclusivity and power away, or is the answer to emulate the institutions that are excluding- do what they do, but with different rules? Can we change elitism, regardless? Should we? Questions, questions…I have gotten pretty into “outsider” movements lately, from self taught artists to small presses to DIY to virtual galleries to collectives… some are people who would gladly leave “outsider status” if they could get that “big break” and some are people who feel that they can create on their own terms, with control over resources. Which is pretty cool. One thing is pretty clear: that outsider movement provide the networks and means for people to take charge of their creativity and get their work out there without many of the traditional barriers like money, commercial appeal, name recognition, formal training, credentials. .. Continue Reading »